Art. 577-11, § 5 of the Law Hamal is absurd, with no consistency to the point of losing any consistency. It is based on outdated concepts and even opened a path probably irresistible to manipulation.
He says: "In case of transfer of ownership of a lot: 1 creditor The outgoing owner of the condominium for the part of his share of working capital corresponding to the during which time he has not actually enjoyed parts in common, the statement shall be prepared by the trustee; 2 its share in the reserve fund remains the property of the association. "
We are moving to new comments and scholarly exegeses on funds variables or not even exist. As they did in their review on registered letters or money left to the discretion of the trustee, the commentators will explain graduates with a lot of interpretations, therefore , art. 577-11, § 5 shall be deemed not written since the trustee has full powers to enliven the funds Working Capital and reserves, to confuse or interchange at will, and through this mess, circumventing both buyers and sellers.
Thus, in a few weeks, as burglars fracturing a safe, trustees and their advisers have broken the new law ensured that some have padlocked. They shot the wooden peg and has fallen. And say
Olivier Hamal believed to have been pious.
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment