The management contract.
Art. 577-8, § 1, para. 2 of the new law on joint ownership: "The provisions governing the relationship between the trustee and the owners' association must be included in a written contract."
It includes a copy of the draft contract will be given to owners with the notice convening the meeting and a discussion about possible changes or improvements will be on the agenda.
The practice is very different and a recent meeting of a major condominium-door testimony.
The agenda stated: "Miscellaneous information about the new law on condominiums. The owners have not received the draft contract and therefore they did not know everything.
The meeting heard a presentation by the trustee on the main provisions of the new law. The contract has been mentioned, during the trustee's speech but no discussion has been opened in this regard. This was an information, not a debate.
Two weeks after the meeting, the owners have read in the minutes: "Contract Management: The board of condominium signed the contract with the trustee."
The co will not know a single word.
is the perpetuation old habits of infernal couple trustee / board-of-ownership denounced for decades and which are maintained because of the passivity of the owners. These, among them, denounced the methods they are victims, but they remain silent and silent during the meeting.
It is true that they have little choice. They bristle, they are threatened or insulted by the trustee, and if they go to court, they are inevitably doomed and abused in humiliating expected.
So there is no antidote to abuse and other abuses of trustees.
By necessity, the owners are reduced obedience. They are forced to serve the soup dominant. Judges and trustees have made them kowtow. That is why they are silent and they pay.
.
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Sunday, January 23, 2011
How Many Snow Chains Do You Need
Disinformation.
Art. 577-9, § 8 of the new Condominium Act says: "Notwithstanding Article 577-2, § 7, the owner whose application, at the conclusion of proceedings the opponent of the condominium is declared founded by the judge, is exempt from participation in the common expense fees and expenses, including the load is distributed among the other owners. If the claim is declared partially valid, the owner is exempted from participation fees and expenses, charged to the condominium pursuant to Article 1017, paragraph 4 of the Judicial Code.
A lawyer, well known co-owners, a chronicle of a widely circulated newspaper, wrote: "If [the owner] will triumph only partially, it is provided that costs under section 1017 of the Code judiciary and must therefore bear its share of other expenses, including attorney's fees to the condominium.
This should warn against the minions of the processes which the trustees to use the good faith of owners and encourage them to believe the untruths that violate both the letter and spirit of laws.
.
Art. 577-9, § 8 of the new Condominium Act says: "Notwithstanding Article 577-2, § 7, the owner whose application, at the conclusion of proceedings the opponent of the condominium is declared founded by the judge, is exempt from participation in the common expense fees and expenses, including the load is distributed among the other owners. If the claim is declared partially valid, the owner is exempted from participation fees and expenses, charged to the condominium pursuant to Article 1017, paragraph 4 of the Judicial Code.
A lawyer, well known co-owners, a chronicle of a widely circulated newspaper, wrote: "If [the owner] will triumph only partially, it is provided that costs under section 1017 of the Code judiciary and must therefore bear its share of other expenses, including attorney's fees to the condominium.
This should warn against the minions of the processes which the trustees to use the good faith of owners and encourage them to believe the untruths that violate both the letter and spirit of laws.
.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Donate Unused Syringes
The sinking of the law.
After the confusion of reserve funds and operating, after the institution of co-responsibility by the multiplication of trustees and co-managers, after the burial of the regular accounts and perpetuation of tangles in accounts, trustees and their cronies continue the demolition of the new law interpretations concocted and assertions increasingly bold.
Art. 577-8, § 5: "The trustee is solely responsible for its management. a long time ago that the judges unanimously, read: "The trustee is one ir responsible for its management" since, in memory of co-owner, no trustee has ever been convicted of misconduct in its management . Through their rulings upheld by the day and year after year, judges continue to certify that no trustee has never committed any fault management.
Art. 577-7, § 1, 1, c), para. 3: "Subject to the statutory powers of the trustee and the assembly Generally, the strata council may accept any other assignment or delegation decision of the General Assembly by a majority of three fourths of the votes. But in his speech at the RTBF to comment on the provisions of the new law, a trustee, well known for its implications in all the dirty tricks, explained that they are trustees, and they alone, who delegate tasks to the strata council.
Art. 577-7, § 1, d): "The General Assembly decides: the value of the contracts and contracts from which a competition is required. In a joint ownership of 60 lots, the meeting decided that a plurality of specifications would be required only from work valued at more than 50,000 euros. When you know, again, the virtuosity of trustees dicked work, we can already conclude that a plurality of specifications will never be applied in this condo or elsewhere because obviously this hoax was concocted by the mafia trustees.
Art. 577-6, § 10: "The trustee prepares the minutes of decisions taken by the General Assembly indicating the majorities obtained and the names of owners who voted against and abstained. At the end of the session and after reading the minutes is signed by the President of the General Assembly, appointed by the secretary at the opening of the session and by all owners still present at that time or their agents ". The trustees have begun to implement this requirement in their own way at the general meeting of a condominium (see above). The minutes on art. 577-6, § 10 was drafted but not sent to the owners. It is kept in the archives of the trustee. The owners have received the usual minutes without any mention about the votes but with considerations of the trustee, its endless denigration of wrong-thinking owners and dripping his peroration of complacency. More
the law should change behavior and it's the same thing.
.
After the confusion of reserve funds and operating, after the institution of co-responsibility by the multiplication of trustees and co-managers, after the burial of the regular accounts and perpetuation of tangles in accounts, trustees and their cronies continue the demolition of the new law interpretations concocted and assertions increasingly bold.
Art. 577-8, § 5: "The trustee is solely responsible for its management. a long time ago that the judges unanimously, read: "The trustee is one ir responsible for its management" since, in memory of co-owner, no trustee has ever been convicted of misconduct in its management . Through their rulings upheld by the day and year after year, judges continue to certify that no trustee has never committed any fault management.
Art. 577-7, § 1, 1, c), para. 3: "Subject to the statutory powers of the trustee and the assembly Generally, the strata council may accept any other assignment or delegation decision of the General Assembly by a majority of three fourths of the votes. But in his speech at the RTBF to comment on the provisions of the new law, a trustee, well known for its implications in all the dirty tricks, explained that they are trustees, and they alone, who delegate tasks to the strata council.
Art. 577-7, § 1, d): "The General Assembly decides: the value of the contracts and contracts from which a competition is required. In a joint ownership of 60 lots, the meeting decided that a plurality of specifications would be required only from work valued at more than 50,000 euros. When you know, again, the virtuosity of trustees dicked work, we can already conclude that a plurality of specifications will never be applied in this condo or elsewhere because obviously this hoax was concocted by the mafia trustees.
Art. 577-6, § 10: "The trustee prepares the minutes of decisions taken by the General Assembly indicating the majorities obtained and the names of owners who voted against and abstained. At the end of the session and after reading the minutes is signed by the President of the General Assembly, appointed by the secretary at the opening of the session and by all owners still present at that time or their agents ". The trustees have begun to implement this requirement in their own way at the general meeting of a condominium (see above). The minutes on art. 577-6, § 10 was drafted but not sent to the owners. It is kept in the archives of the trustee. The owners have received the usual minutes without any mention about the votes but with considerations of the trustee, its endless denigration of wrong-thinking owners and dripping his peroration of complacency. More
the law should change behavior and it's the same thing.
.
Friday, January 7, 2011
St Martin Adult Only Topless
Glue Cleopatra
jar white glue Cleopatra with his spatula and incomparable almond smell remains forever in the memories childish. We will never eat all the glues that we 80's generation, but ineffective with this glue so good with his fine taste. Despite its success it will be blacklisted by the glue stick Hue.
jar white glue Cleopatra with his spatula and incomparable almond smell remains forever in the memories childish. We will never eat all the glues that we 80's generation, but ineffective with this glue so good with his fine taste. Despite its success it will be blacklisted by the glue stick Hue.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)