judgments relating to condominiums but there are many publications are rare.
is why it is important to draw attention to some cases hangable among the most characteristic but experts have not seen fit to publish the recitals may be not to stir up trouble on the serenity of justice.
can glean here and there with rare and valuable information on the legal troubles of owners who often have unfortunately not received deserved publicity.
Lack of good documentation on how the owners are treated in court is very often the source of catastrophic blunders.
To understand this difficult problem and get an appropriate representation, you should read the judgments but also sought. Presence at hearings is as strong lessons. One can observe the attitudes of judges and will be surprised by their behavior, their disparaging comments and by their contempt for the owners confident or naive.
In general, it is almost impossible to understand a decision without having read the submissions of the parties so the expected manipulate the facts.
Owners who have been proceedings have been bullying and humiliation. The crowd of owners rebels is immense. So we read in the press parable unrealistic but dangerous because of some whose offbeat spirit seems to beat the campaign, the reality is much less rosy. It is worth pausing a few case studies and unfortunately characteristic of the general drift of the judiciary.
must warn those who, with their right, would trust to justice.
could cook them. And the game does not worth the candle.
In Belgium, experience has shown that joint ownership it is always less damaging to suffer.
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment